Şizofreni Hastalarına Bakım Verenlerin Aktivite, Aktivite Performansı ve Sağlıkla İlgili Yaşam Kalitelerinin İncelenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was planned to collect data on caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in our country and analysis of their activity, activity performance and health-related quality of life. 66 patients with schizophrenia caregivers (study group) and 66 patients with schizophrenia who do not, or any chronic patient care (control group) were included in the study. Personal factors about caregiving were evaluated with Sociodemographic Characteristics Information Form. Assessment of activity performance and satisfaction with Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, assessment of health-related quality of life with Quality of Life Scale-Short Form (Short Form SF-36), assessment of depression with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), assessment of anxiety states Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were used. According to our studies results, the performance of activities of the working group and the control group was not statistically significant difference (p> 0.05), activity satisfaction between the two groups was statistically significant difference (p<0,05). From the SF-36 the mean subscales between the groups in physical function, physical role limitations, and pain were not statistically significant difference (p> 0,05). General health, vitality, social function, role emotional and mental health between two groups statistically significant difference was found (p <0,05). According to the BDI and BAI, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups (p <0,05). Furthermore, we examined the relationship between activity performance and satisfaction, quality of life, depression and anxiety. As a result, it can be seen, increased levels of depression and anxiety, decreased levels of quality of life and activity satisfaction in caregivers of patients with schizophrenia. They may affect each other. To define in detail activity performance areas are affected by the caregivers and to shed light on in the field of rehabilitation interventions studies which are needed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".