MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557434877 · doi:10.4043/27378-ms

The Ford’s Bight Diatreme A Cretaceous Alnöite Pipe from the Northern Labrador Coast and Possible Onland Remnant from the Opening of the Labrador Sea

2016· article· en· W2557434877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiatremeGeologyCretaceousPaleontologyBrecciaSedimentary rockRadiometric datingClastic rockPrecambrianKimberlite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Ford’s Bight Diatreme is an apparently rare feature on the Precambrian coast of Labrador. Originally described as a Jurassic-Cretaceous sedimentary breccia cut by lamprophyric dykes, an early report of marine microfossils in the strata poses an interesting sedimentary and petroleum geology problem. In revisiting the area, the succession is now viewed as a rift related diatreme with a Cretaceous (ca. 137 Ma) radiometric age. In earlier work, this rock was dated from assemblages of poorly preserved Jurassic and early Cretaceous marine microfossils. Our own lengthy search for fossils in igneous rocks and clasts and carbonate matrix was fruitless. Some apparently carbonized debris is identified in microscopy and with some oddly shaped (non-biologic) microcrystalline structures seen under SEM. With an age and origin for this feature established from basic geology and radiometric dating, this therein leaves an unresolved petroleum exploration risk - and, namely, did Jurassic marine conditions cover this part of the Labrador coast before earliest Cretaceous volcanism?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it