Resource Extractivism in Latin America: Canadian Investments in Mining
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latin American Policy invited Laura MacDonald and Pablo Heidrich as guest editors to prepare the core articles for this issue. Both scholars in the Department of Political Science at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, they prepared an excellent collection of eight articles dealing with Canadian mining investments in key countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Guatemala, Mexico, and Peru. We are very grateful to our guest editors and to all of the contributors for their interest in publishing in our journal. We hope our readers find these contributions interesting and attractive for their respective policy making or research. In our Policy Articles section, we also include three contributions from other authors, dealing with microfinance and trade-policy issues in Brazil and with renewable-energy policies in Central America. Finally, readers will find two interesting book reviews in the respective section. Isidro Morales is Editor-in-Chief of Latin American Policy and is a professor at the School of Government, Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it