MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557517892 · doi:10.21609/jsi.v12i2.481

VISUALISASI DATA INTERAKTIF DATA TERBUKA PEMERINTAH PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA: TOPIK EKONOMI DAN KEUANGAN DAERAH

2016· article· en· W2557517892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sistem Informasi · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationComputer scienceData scienceData visualizationQuarter (Canadian coin)World Wide WebData miningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on statistics from data.id, in the first quarter of 2016, there are 1,137 datasets distributed at 32 institutions and 18 groups in Indonesia. DKI Jakarta Province contributes to these data at the most, i.e. 714 datasets. A lot of accessible open datasets have an impact on the availability of valuable information that can be extracted to good use, for businesses, governments, and personal lives. To get the desired information, an exploratory data analysis is needed to make data more alive. The goal of this research is to provide a proper visualization of the given data. Data visualization is a way (perhaps a solution) to communicate abstract data, to aid in data understanding by leveraging human visual system. The result of this visualization is effective and engaging charts appropriates to the given data and can be run on mobile platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0080.006
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it