MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557518910 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314094170

Insights on small-molecules inhibitors and protein-protein interactions of the T4SS

2014· article· en· W2557518910 on OpenAlexaff
Ingrid Um Nlend, Christian Baron

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirulenceVirulence factorBiologyBacteriaFunction (biology)MicrobiologyCell biologyBiochemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Bacterial T4SS are complexes, constituted of 8 to 12 conserved proteins, used by many gram-negative bacteria for the translocation of proteins and DNA-protein complexes as well as for the transportation of DNA-protein complexes across their cell envelope. T4SS are excellent model targets for the development of antivirulence drugs as it is an essential virulence factor for many bacterial pathogens, such as Brucella. Antivirulence drugs that deprive the pathogen of its essential virulence factor, the T4SS, would constitute alternatives to or enhancements of current antibiotic treatment. VirB8, a conserved assembly factor in T4SS forms dimers that are very important for T4SS function in these pathogens. Due to its multiple interactions, VirB8 is an excellent model for the analysis of assembly factors but also a possible target for drugs that could target its protein–protein interactions, which would disarm bacteria by depriving them of their essential virulence functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207