MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557661941 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/29/4/045803

Quantum statistics and squeezing for a microwave-driven interacting magnon system

2016· article· en· W2557661941 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra Haghshenasfard, M. G. Cottam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMagnonCreation and annihilation operatorsPhysicsHamiltonian (control theory)BosonQuantum statistical mechanicsQuantumDipoleQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsSecond quantizationQuantum electrodynamicsFerromagnetismMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Theoretical studies are reported for the statistical properties of a microwave-driven interacting magnon system. Both the magnetic dipole-dipole and the exchange interactions are included and the theory is developed for the case of parallel pumping allowing for the inclusion of the nonlinear processes due to the four-magnon interactions. The method of second quantization is used to transform the total Hamiltonian from spin operators to boson creation and annihilation operators. By using the coherent magnon state representation we have studied the magnon occupation number and the statistical behavior of the system. In particular, it is shown that the nonlinearities introduced by the parallel pumping field and the four-magnon interactions lead to non-classical quantum statistical properties of the system, such as magnon squeezing. Also control of the collapse-and-revival phenomena for the time evolution of the average magnon number is demonstrated by varying the parallel pumping amplitude and the four-magnon coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicQuantum Information and CryptographyFrench-language works237,207