MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557673870 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.195209

Optical transitions from the lowest to higher exciton and biexciton Rydberg states in CuCl

2016· article· en· W2557673870 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kensuke Miyajima, K. Sakaniwa, Michihiko Sugawara

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConnaught Fund
KeywordsBiexcitonExcitonRydberg formulaAtomic physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We measured the optical transitions due to the internal energy levels of an exciton and biexciton in a CuCl single crystal using pump-probe spectroscopy. The transient absorption bands due to the transitions from the $1s$ to $2p$ and from the $1s$ to $3p$ exciton states were observed at 3 K, which is consistent with their reported energies. Simultaneously, the transient absorption peak due to the biexciton was observed, which corresponds to a transition from the lowest state (composed of two $1s$ excitons) to higher states (composed of $1s$ and $2p$ excitons). The value of the observed biexciton peak energy was reasonable considering the hydrogen molecule orbitals and the electron-to-hole effective mass ratio. In addition, the transient absorption peaks were broadened at 77 K, because of the increase in the homogeneous width of the $2p$ exciton state. The transient absorption spectrum was almost completely determined by this width. Our findings are of importance with regard to the optical phenomena in the infrared region related to the quantum coherence of excitons and biexcitons in semiconductors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207