MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557685697 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2016-0187

Morphology and stomatal density of developing <i>Arceuthobium americanum</i> (lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe) fruit: a qualitative and quantitative analysis using environmental scanning electron microscopy

2016· article· en· W2557685697 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dylan J. Ziegler, Cynthia Ross Friedman

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Parasitism and Resistance
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPinus contortaBotanyAbscissionOrchidaceaeSepalHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arceuthobium americanum Nutt. ex Engelm., the lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe, is a dioecious parasitic flowering plant infecting lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta subsp. latifolia (Engelm.) Critchfield) in the Pacific Northwest, compromising timber value by stunting the host’s growth. The plant disperses its seeds by explosive discharge, and thus understanding its reproduction is an integral step toward managing its spread. The life cycle of Arceuthobium americanum occurs over five to six years, and the fruit matures over two consecutive growing seasons, dispersing in the second. Using low-vacuum environmental scanning electron microscopy (eSEM), we examined branching architecture as well as the morphology and anatomy of fruits during their second year of development up to explosive discharge. We found that branching patterns shifted from opposite-decussate to verticillate after several years’ growth. In addition, the perianth parts (sepals), style, and stigma persisted through the season, and the fruit’s abscission zone developed slightly distal to the end of the pedicel. Stomata, found only on the sepals, were located in crypts surrounded by two subsidiary cells, and stomatal density significantly decreased during development. The decline in stomatal density along with the thick pericarp cuticle may function in retaining water inside the fruit to facilitate discharge and (or) provide a heating mechanism through reduced transpiration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant Parasitism and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207