MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2557709742 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.184.184

Vascularization Predicts Overall Survival (OS) & Risk of Transformation (RT) in Uniformly Treated Patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL).

2007· article· en· W2557709742 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro Farinha, Randy D. Gascoyne, Alistair Kyle, Andrew I. Minchinton, Joseph M. Connors, Aly Karsan

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular lymphomaCD34AngiogenesisMedicinePathologyTumor microenvironmentLymphomaStage (stratigraphy)Radiation therapyInternal medicineCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: FL is an indolent disease with heterogeneous survival. Transformation is asscoiated with short survival. In solid tumors, tumor angiogenesis is required for tumor growth/metastasis and microvessel density (MVD) has, in some tumor types, shown correlation with poor OS. In FL, the impact of MVD on prognosis is controversial. Recent studies have highlighted the effect of the microenvironment on FL prognosis including ours which showed that high numbers of lymphoma-associated-macrophages (LAM) are associated with adverse outcome. Because LAM have been shown to promote angiogenesis and neoplastic growth, we used a quantitative tumor mapping approach to determine whether the degree of vascularization in FL correlated with adverse outcome. Method: Between 1987 and 1993, 126 pts were enrolled on a phase II study of BP-VACOP with involved region radiotherapy. All pts were treatment naïve, < 61y and had advanced-stage FL. Paraffin blocks of the diagnostic biopsies were available for 105 pts. Images of whole sections stained for CD34 were captured using a cooled CCD camera, a motorized stage, and customized NIH-Image software. The motorized stage allowed for tiling of adjacent microscope fields of view, thereby allowing reassembly of the entire tumor section at high-resolution. The distance from each point in the tissue to the nearest CD34+ pixel was measured and the tumor to vessel distance that encompassed 90% of the tumor (TVD90) calculated. A TMA was immunostained with S100A8/Calgranulin A-specific antibody, a M2-like macrophage marker, to determine a subset of LAM. Univariate & multivariate analyses were used to determine OS and RT. Results: There were 84 evaluable cases. The median follow-up of the living patients was 14.3 y and the estimated 10-y OS and RT were 65% and 20%, respectively. The IPI was predictive of OS (RR =3.4, 95% CI =1.8–6.3, p < 0.001) and RT (RR =3.3, 95% CI =1.3–7.9, p = 0.01). Histologic grade included 66 grade 1, 14 grade 2 and 4 grade 3a. Cases revealed TVD90 of 50.3 to 144 microns (median 78.4) and were divided into quartiles. A subset of 14 cases showed high density of S100A8+ cells (> 5 per high power field). In univariate analysis the quartile (21 cases) with low TVD90 (i.e. high MVD) showed inferior OS (p < 0.001) and high RT (p = 0.012). Cases with high density of S100A8+ LAM also had inferior OS (p = 0.04), but the high density did not predict RT (p = 0.4). A Cox multivariate model with IPI, S100A8+ score and TVD90 showed only IPI and TVD90 to be independent predictors of OS (RR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.6–5.6, P = 0.001; RR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.3–4.7, p = 0.009, respectively), but only TVD90 predicted RT (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.2–7.6, p = 0.017). Interestingly, low TVD90 (i.e. high MVD) correlated with increased content of S100A8+ cells (χ2, p < 0.001). Conclusion: These results show that in FL, increased vascularization is independently associated with an adverse clinical outcome and, most importantly, predicts for increased RT. These findings may provide a rationale for trials of antiangiogenic therapy in “aggressive” FLs. Tumor to Vessel Distance (TVD) and Follicular Lymphoma Overall Survival & Risk of Transformation Tumor to Vessel Distance (TVD) and Follicular Lymphoma Overall Survival & Risk of Transformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→