MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557828239 · doi:10.1145/2992138.2992139

ISSv3

2016· article· en· W2557828239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsAugmented realityComputer scienceImmersion (mathematics)Virtual realityMultimediaAndroid (operating system)Computer-mediated realityHuman–computer interactionVirtual worldFocus (optics)Mixed realityMetaverseMobile appsComputer graphics (images)World Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a small research-creation interactive augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) documentary prototype. Its design extends the predecessor AR mobile app component incorporating AR footage previously only available in traditional mobile screen into a VR world. The mobile app prototype runs on iOS and Android and integrates interactive 3D models and objects in the VR world, the previous app did not have in an effort to increase engagement and educational aspects appealing to a wider audience. The focus of this project is to enhance user engagement and create immersion for interactive documentaries by combining Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in order to create virtual worlds where users can enjoy watching, hearing, and reading content. We develop Illimitable Space System v3 as inspired by v1 in early days that used both motion capture and initial lower end augmented reality setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207