MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557835022 · doi:10.4043/27404-ms

The Extent of Water Sheet Breakup on a Vertical Surface

2016· article· en· W2557835022 on OpenAlexafffund
Debashish Saha, S. R. Dehghani, Kevin Pope, Yuri S. Muzychka

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersPetroleum Research Newfoundland and Labrador
KeywordsSplashBreakupGeologyFroude numberWaves and shallow waterEnvironmental scienceSubmarine pipelineLiquid waterWeber numberSurface waterMechanicsMeteorologyGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents an experimental investigation on the extent of water splash resulting from the collision of a flat water jet onto a vertical surface. The water sheet spread on the plate and its splash, as a result of water breakup, are the most significant phenomena that affect water delivery to marine and offshore structures. In an arctic environment, wave impact and splash can significantly affect ice accretion on a marine structure. To predict ice accretion, water sheet breakup behavior onto a surface needs to be studied closely. The motivation of this experimental study is to further examine water sheet splash. The tests performed in the lab scale setup comprise of high-speed image capture from a water jet-vertical surface collision at various attack angles, which cause mild to severe breakup situations. The results show that variation in jet velocity significantly affects the height, width and splash area of a water sheet. The results also show that attack angle is another significant factor for water trajectory and therefore water shedding beyond the vertical surface. The interdependence in between water trajectory and water shedding provides a new correlation of water transport after water sheet breakup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArctic Technology ConferenceSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207