MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557840842 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2016.7746288

A data acquisition system based on Raspberry Pi: Design, construction and evaluation

2016· article· en· W2557840842 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Akhoondi Asadi, Shahriar Bagheri, Ahmed Imam, Ehsan Jalayeri, Witold Kinsner, Nariman Sepehri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionMicrocomputerSignal conditioningComputer scienceBenchmark (surveying)Computer hardwareRaspberry piReading (process)Analog signalSIGNAL (programming language)Range (aeronautics)Embedded systemReal-time computingEngineeringOperating systemPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the construction of a low-cost data acquisition system (DAS) prototype based on Raspberry Pi-2 microcomputer. The prototype is designed to operate as a standalone system without the need for an additional personal computer (PC). It performs the data acquisition, online plotting and data logging, simultaneously. This is a general-purpose setup, as it is capable of reading any analog sensor giving output in the designed range, or through appropriate signal conditioning. The system is tested in a Mechanical laboratory by collecting data which are compared to a benchmark DAS. Statistical analyses are also performed on the acquired data. It is proved that both signals are identical with only minor differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207