MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557935188 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314083661

Structural and Functional Analysis of the interaction between PCNA and ATAD5

2014· article· en· W2557935188 on OpenAlexaff
Guangxin Xing, Haley McConkey, Vikash Jha, Hong Ling

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProliferating cell nuclear antigenDNA replicationIsothermal titration calorimetryReplication factor CMolecular biologyBiologyDNADNA clampReplication protein ADNA repairCell biologyChemistryBiophysicsBiochemistryDNA-binding proteinEukaryotic DNA replicationTranscription factorGeneReverse transcriptase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a DNA sliding clamp that coordinates DNA replication and repair. PCNA is loaded on and unloaded off of DNA during replication. It is loaded onto DNA by the replication factor C (RFC) complex. The mechanism of PCNA unloading is not fully understood however. ATPase family AAA domain containing protein 5 (ATAD5) interacts with subunits of RFC to form a RFC-like complex that functions in unloading PCNA. Reduced expression of ATAD5 extends the life of replication factories by retaining PCNA and other repliosome proteins on chromatin. ATAD5 also plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, as mutations to ATAD5 cause genomic instability in mice and human cells. The region of ATAD5 that interacts with PCNA had yet to be determined. Proteins interacting with PCNA usually have a PCNA-interaction protein (PIP) motif termed the PIP-box. Through sequence analysis, we identified a putative PIP-box in ATAD5. Using GST pull-down experiments, we found that the putative PIP-box bound to PCNA. Mutation of the key residues in the PIP-box abolished the binding. The interaction was also confirmed by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) analysis of PCNA and a synthetic peptide containing the PIP-box. The binding constant (Kd) of the PCNA-peptide interaction is 6.2μM, determined by the ITC assays. To further characterize the interaction, we co-crystallized PCNA and the ATAD5 peptide. The complex crystals diffracted to a resolution of 3.5Å. The crystals belong to the space group H3, with unit-cell parameters a = 83.6Å and c = 211.4Å. Our molecular replacement solution indicates that the peptide binds on PCNA at the conserved PIP-box binding pocket. Taken together, our work demonstrates that ATAD5 does contain a PIP motif that directly interacts with PCNA. The structure-function studies on the interaction will provide insights into the molecular mechanism of PCNA unloading and the role of ATAD5 in DNA replication and repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207