MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557945591 · doi:10.1121/2.0000284

A new paradigm for underwater noise management in coastal areas: Acoustic compensation

2016· article· en· W2557945591 on OpenAlexaff
Kathy Heise, Lance Barrett‐Lennard

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of meetings on acoustics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsVancouver Aquarium
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatCompensation (psychology)Offset (computer science)Environmental scienceHabitat destructionEnvironmental resource managementUnderwaterEcosystemRestoration ecologyDegradation (telecommunications)Marine ecosystemComputer scienceEcologyOceanographyTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The science of restoration ecology has advanced steadily since the 1970’s, as concern about losses of biological diversity in terrestrial and freshwater habitats has grown. This has led to measures that offset the degradation or destruction of habitat by creating, enhancing, restoring or protecting compensatory areas. A second related conservation measure involves mitigating damage caused by one activity to compensate for damage caused by another. Carbon-trading operates on this transference principle. All are intended to ensure ‘no net loss’ of ecosystem services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of meetings on acousticsSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207