Album photographique scolaire, histoire et configuration de l’identité des établissements scolaires: le cas du collège Sant Josep Obrer de Palma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les établissements scolaires photographient leurs activités, les conservent et, parfois, les publient dans des livres ou des revues et, de nos jours, sur le Web également. Outre le fait qu’elles constituent un bien patrimonial utile à la connaissance de l’histoire de ces institutions, ces photographies peuvent également avoir d’autres fonctions comme celle de construire une mémoire collective qui permette de renforcer l’identité commune de leurs anciens élèves et de construire un discours historique qui étaie leur projet éducatif actuel. Dans le cas qui nous occupe, et en tant qu’exemple de ce qui vient d’être dit, nous analyserons ci-dessous les photographies publiées par le Collège Sant Josep Obrer de Palma de Majorque dans l’objectif d’établir le lien entre ces images et le modèle éducatif que le centre souhaite transmettre tant du point de vue historique qu’actuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".