MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558116404 · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2016.259473

Critically High Plasma Ammonia in an Adolescent Girl

2016· article· en· W2558116404 on OpenAlexaff
Dennis J. Orton, Jessica L. Gifford, Isolde Seiden‐Long, Aneal Khan, Lawrence de Koning

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperammonemiaUrea cycleMedicineSodium benzoateAmmoniaHeadachesConfidence intervalUrineHepatic encephalopathyGastroenterologyPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryArginineChemistryAmino acidBiochemistryCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 12-year-old female patient presented with nonspecific symptoms including fatigue, fever, and headache persisting for approximately 4 months. Plasma ammonia was 230 μg/dL (135 μmol/L) (critical value >187 μg/dL or 110 μmol/L). The patient was referred to a pediatric emergency center for urgent evaluation of hyperammonemia. Plasma and urine amino acid testing was performed to investigate the possibility of a urea cycle disorder; however, all results were normal. Over the following 2 weeks, the patient was treated with intravenous sodium benzoate/sodium phenylacetate and l-arginine to reduce the blood ammonia concentration. However, the patient's ammonia concentration never dropped below 94 μg/dL (55 μmol/L) (upper limit of reference interval, 80 μg/dL or 47 μmol/L), with concentrations as high as 296 μg/dL (174 μmol/L) with inconsistent associations between ammonia concentrations and headaches. During the course of treatment, the patient suffered substantial side effects of intravenous therapy and underwent numerous costly clinical and laboratory investigations. Amino acid investigations were repeated but results remained normal. Given the large fluctuations in blood ammonia concentrations with inconsistent response to intravenous medications, the metabolic service contacted the laboratory to inquire about a possible preanalytical or analytical cause. One week before this query, a community physician also contacted the laboratory regarding hyperammonemia in several patients. However, no obvious preanalytical or analytical errors were discovered despite numerous audits of preanalytical conditions and review of quality control data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical ChemistrySame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207