MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558152780 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0240

Variation of Sodium Uptake Rate in Suaeda glauca and Its Relation to Plant Size and Salt Acclimation

2016· article· en· W2558152780 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Yun Kong, Youbin Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalinityAcclimatizationSodiumSalt (chemistry)NutrientHorticultureBiologyBotanyAnimal scienceChemistryAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To characterize the pattern of sodium uptake by Suaeda glauca (Bunge) plants at mild salinity, this study investigated the temporal variation of sodium uptake rate (mmol Na+ plant−1 d−1) and its relation to plant size (i.e., main stem length) and salt acclimation for S. glauca grown in nutrient solutions with 6, 8, or 10 mM NaCl. During the 23-d salt treatment, sodium uptake rate in S. glauca increased gradually at 5- to 7-d intervals with time advancement and showed a positive exponential relationship with the development of plant size. During the first week (0–7 d) of salt treatment, the weekly average sodium uptake rate was higher in larger plants than in smaller ones. During the last week (18–23 d) of salt treatment, non-salt-acclimated plants showed a similar sodium uptake rate (on a weekly average) to salt-acclimated plants when their plant sizes were not significantly different. These results suggest that at the largest plant size (i.e., 1 wk before harvesting as a leafy vegetable), S. glauca reached the maximum level of sodium uptake rate, which was affected to a larger degree by plant size than by salt acclimation on a weekly scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207