MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558179769 · doi:10.1115/pvp2016-64034

Allowable Piping Imposed Nozzle Loads on Pumps of Large Diameter Nozzles

2016· article· en· W2558179769 on OpenAlexaff
Bhaskar Dattatray Shitolé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsAmec Foster Wheeler (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzlePipingMoment (physics)NPSHMechanical engineeringMechanicsStructural engineeringSuctionStress (linguistics)Flow (mathematics)EngineeringMarine engineeringPhysicsImpeller

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Piping imposed loads are external forces and moments acting on pump suction and discharge nozzles. API 610 2010, 11th Edition, Table 5, provides a basis for nozzle sizes DN 50 to DN 400 for external forces and moments on pump nozzles. There is a frequent need in the industry for pumps of larger volumetric flow rates to have nozzle sizes larger than DN 400. The fast-track requirements of a project schedule needs a realistic and quick methodology for the pump manufacturer and piping stress engineer to have a basis for calculating external forces and moments imposed on nozzle sizes larger than DN 400. This paper provides a methodology for determining forces and moments on pump nozzle sizes larger than DN 400. The methodology is based on the practical aspect of the most important property of pipe, which influences the quantity of force and moment it can impose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207