MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1.3 GHz Cavity Test Program for ARIEL

2015· article· en· W2558248002 on OpenAlexaff
Philipp Kolb, Eli Bourassa, P. Harmer, James Keir, David Kishi, Devon Lang, Robert Laxdal, Howard Liu, Yanyun Ma, Robert Orr, Tamao Shishido, T. Shishido, D. A. Trischuk, Bhalwinder Waraich, Zhongyuan Yao, Vladimir Zvyagintsev

Bibliographic record

VenueJACOW · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTest (biology)Computer scienceRemote sensingGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ARIEL eLINAC is a 50 MeV 10 mA electron LINAC. Once finished, five cavities will each provide 10MV of effective accelerating voltage. At the present time two cavities have been installed and successfully accelerated been above specifications of 10 MV/m at a Q0 of 10¹⁰. The next cavities are already in the pipeline and being processed. In addition, one additional cavity has been produced for our collaboration with VECC, India. This cavity has been tested and installed in a cryomodule identical to the eLINAC injector cryomodule. New developments for single cell testing at TRIUMF are a T-mapping system developed in collaboration with UoT and vertical EP for single cells. The progress of the performance after each treatment step has been measured and will be shown. measured and will be shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACOWSame topicSemiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207