MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558270412 · doi:10.9744/century.5.1.10-17

RITUAL PERAYAAN IMLEK ETNIS TIONGHOA DI KOTA TOLI-TOLI

2016· article· id· W2558270412 on OpenAlex
David Lievander, Olivia Olivia, Chun‐I Kuo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCentury Journal of Chinese Language Literature and Culture · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Artistic Studies
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penduduk Tiongkok telah lama menyebar ke berbagai belahan dunia, dengan membawa berbagai macam kebudayaan serta tradisi, tidak terkecuali di Indonesia. Etnis tionghoa menyebar dengan merata di seluruh Indonesia dengan membawa kebudayaan asal mereka. Hari raya Imlek adalah salah satu contohnya, setiap daerah di Indonesia mempunyai perayaan Imlek mereka sendiri oleh karena itu penulis tertarik untuk meneliti perayaan etnis Tionghoa di kota Toli-toli. Penelitian ini meliputi apa perbedaan Imlek etnis Tionghoa Toli-toli pada masa orde baru dan mengapa terjadi perbedaan itu. Setelah dilakukan penelitian ditemukan bahwa etnis Tionghoa hanya merayakan chuxi, Imlek, hari kedua, hari kesembilan, dan Cap Go Meh. Perayaan Cap Go Meh di kota Toli-toli cenderung sepi dan tidak ada yang spesial. Serta ditemukan faktor yang membuat Imlek di kota Toli-toli saat orde baru dan sekarang berbeda yaitu karena faktor politik dan ekonomi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it