A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING ARTHROGRAPHIC JOINT INJECTION WITH AND WITHOUT STEROIDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimated to affect 2–5% of the population, adhesive capsulitis is a common cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. The objective of this study is to determine if arthrographic injection of the shoulder joint with steroid, local anesthetic and contrast is an effective treatment modality for adhesive capsulitis and whether it is superior to arthrographic injection with local anesthetic and contrast alone. This is a double-blinded RCT of patients with a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis who were randomly assigned to receive an image guided arthrographic glenohumeral injection with either triamcinalone (steroid), lidocaine (local anesthetic) and contrast or lidocaine and contrast alone. Outcome measures included active and passive shoulder range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the Constant Score and a Visual Analog Scale for pain. Post-operative evaluation occurred at 3 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Descriptive statistics were utilised to summarise patient demographics and other study parameters. One-way ANOVAs compared the VAS, Constant and SPADI scores across the different time points for both study groups. The post hoc Bonferroni correction was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. There were 37 shoulders injected with follow-up visits at 12 weeks. Twenty shoulders were randomised to receive local plus steroid and 17 shoulders received local anesthetic only. There were 21 females and 14 males with an average age of 54 years (range, 42–70). VAS scores for both patient groups were significantly improved (p The optimal treatment for adhesive capsulitis remains unclear. Our study demonstrated that patients receiving an arthrographic injection of either steroid and local anesthetic or local anesthetic alone had significantly improved post-injection pain scores. However, only the steroid and local anesthetic group demonstrated improved SPADI disability and Constant scores. Thus, we believe that either treatment may be a good option for patients with adhesive capsulitis and can reliably relieve pain, but we would recommend the steroid with local anesthetic over the local anesthetic alone as it may provide improved function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".