MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558341658

What Is an 'International School'?

2015· article· en· W2558341658 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational schools journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternational educationCurriculumInternational communityComparative educationSociologyLegitimacyState (computer science)Political sciencePedagogyLawHigher education
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Part two of this paper is based on two prescriptions: accepting thatnot all international schools offer an international education (that is, an education for international mindedness) but many do; andboth state and private (independent) national schools can offer an international education, and they are doing so in increasing numbers.Hayden & Thompson (1996 pp50-51) conceded that not all international schools necessarily provide an international education. I also raised this same point a few years later (Hill 2000 pp30-31). This means that there is a difference between international education and an international school - they are not necessarily one and the same.The legitimacy of an international education in national, as well as international schools, has been recognised as long ago as 1986 by Belle-Isle, He was the driving force behind the implementation and development of the ISA Curriculum (which became the IB MYP in 1994) in French in many state schools in the province of Quebec during the 1980s, He saw first-hand that it was possible 'bearing in mind the intellectual and cultural mobility not only of the individual but, most of all, of thought' (Belle-Isle 1986 p29).This allows us to separate the educational programme from the nature of the school itself - from its student and governing bodies, whether a school is for profit or not, and from its raison d'etre. What is more important to international educators is whether the school is developing international mindedness in its students, wherever they might be and whoever they are. Whether we call it an international school, a national state or private school, an EU school, or whatever, is less important. IB schools are extremely varied, but their one common bond is that they all seek to develop international mindedness as defined by the IB Learner Profile and mission statement. This was once considered the province of the classic international school only, Many types of schools have, and want, access to IB programmes which were developed initially for that ideal type.Bunnell (2014:149) states: 'discussing the definition of an International School probably does still matter.' (His italics). George Walker responds in his book review: 'It certainly does' and goes on to consider any school which dispenses international education as an 'international school'.An international school is an organization that offers its students an international education through the medium of its curriculum, its planned learning. An international curriculum is the thread that connects different types of international schools be they formally associated with the United Nations; be they state or privately funded, profit or not-forprofit; be they multicultural in terms of staff and students; be they located in the northern or southern hemisphere, housed in a medieval castle or on a concrete and plate-glass campus. And just as it is possible to describe the essential elements of a good scientific education, or a musical education or an holistic education or a Montessori education, so it must surely be possible to describe the essential elements of an international education (Walker 2015:79)I would respond with an enthusiastic 'yes' about being able to enunciate the essential characteristics of an international education; IB, I PC and Oxfam, for example, have been doing that for years. I would utter another resounding 'yes' that international education can be provided in the various types of schools and places which Walker mentions above. I am less exuberant about equating the term 'international school' with an international education when we know that not all schools established for families living abroad temporarily or longer term, that is 'international schools' in the classic pre-IB sense, dispense an international education. Nevertheless, it is one way of looking at it.Another way is to think of schools offering a sound international education as 'internationally minded schools', and reserve the label 'international school' for those that were established originally for families abroad (market-driven), and for schools deliberately set up to bring together students from many cultural backgrounds (missiondriven) to promote intercultural understanding and awareness of global issues (such as UWCs). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational schools journalSame topicGlobal Education and MulticulturalismFrench-language works237,207