MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Combined Targeting of BCR-ABL and JAK2 with ABL and JAK2 Inhibitors Is Effective Against CML Patients' Leukemic Stem/Progenitor Cells.

2010· article· en· W2558380786 on OpenAlexaff
Donna DeGeer, Paolo Gallipoli, Min Chen, Ivan Sloma, Heather G. Jørgensen, Donna L. Forrest, Karen Lambie, Helen Nakamoto, Kyi Min Saw, Matthew Chan, Kathleen Newmarch, Leon Zhou, Ali G. Turhan, Ralph B. Arlinghaus, Allen Eaves, Connie J. Eaves, Tessa L. Holyoake, Xiaoyan Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellStem cellImatinib mesylateCancer researchHaematopoiesisTyrosine kinaseABLImatinibK562 cellsBiologyMyeloid leukemiaMedicineImmunologyLeukemiaCell biologySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3404 Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that induces clinical responses in most chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Nevertheless, early relapses and later emergence of IM-resistant disease pose serious concerns for many. The inadequacies of IM therapy are due, at least in part, to the unique properties of CML stem/progenitor cells that make them generally less responsive to IM and, indeed, other TKIs, and also confer on them a genetic instability that leads to a high rate of formation of BCR-ABL mutants. Improved treatment approaches to prevent the development of resistant subclones by targeting other key molecular elements active in CML stem/progenitor cells are thus clearly needed. One candidate is a complex that forms in CML stem/progenitor cells between the oncoproteins encoded by AHI-1 (Abelson helper integration site 1), BCR-ABL and the JAK2 kinase. This complex contributes to the transforming activity of BCR-ABL both in vitro and in vivo and also plays a role in the IM response/resistance of primary CML stem/progenitor cells. We now describe the results of experiments designed to test the ability of ABL and JAK2 inhibitors to block the activity of this protein complex in CML cells. K562 cells engineered to stably overexpress AHI-1 showed a significantly reduced sensitivity to both IM (at 1 and 5 μM) and TG101209, a JAK2 inhibitor, (at 0.5 and 1 μM), as determined by assays for cell viability, apopotosis, and colony-forming activity. K562 cells engineered to suppression AHI-1 showed an opposite effect, with a heightened sensitivity to IM at concentrations as low as 1 μM. In addition, IM together with TG101209 was more effective at killing AHI-1-overexpressing K562 cells, IM-resistant K562 cells and IM-resistant T315I-mutant cells than either treatment alone. Western blot and co-IP experiments demonstrated a significant reduction of p-BCR-ABL, p-JAK2 and p-STAT5 in cells treated with IM plus TG101209 compared to cells treated with IM or TG101209 alone. Importantly, treatment with 5 μM IM, 150 nM dasatinib (DA) or 5 μM nilotinib (NL) in combination with 100 nM TG101209 caused a significantly greater reduction in the viability of primary CD34+CD38− and CD34+CD38+ CML cells when these responses were compared to any of the TKIs or TG101209 alone (~2-4 fold, n=3). Apoptotic cells at 72 hours were also significantly increased for all drug combinations compared to single agent treatments (40%-52% for the combinations vs 15%-18% for the single agents). CFSE tracking analysis of cell division in these cells further demonstrated additive anti-proliferative activity from the TKI plus TG101219 combinations, although some rare undivided cells were not eliminated. Nevertheless, exposure of CD34+ CML cells from IM-nonresponders (n=4) to TG101209 plus IM or DA did cause a greater inhibition (81% and 85%) of patients' colony-forming cells as compared to the same cells treated with the combination of IM plus DA only, or IM or DA only (60%, 41% and 50% inhibition, p<0.05). Long-term culture-initiating cell assays were undertaken to compare the effect of these combination treatments versus the effects of TKIs or TG101209 alone on very primitive CML cells. The results again showed a more significant reduction of these cells treated with the combination (n=3). Intracellular staining revealed a greater reduction in the levels of p-CrKL and p-STAT5 in CD34+ CML cells treated for 24 hours with the combination of TKIs plus TG101219 as compared to single TKI-treated cells (~44% vs 65% for p-CrKL and 36% vs 57% for p-STAT5, n=3). Strikingly, the combination treatment produced an even greater inhibition of both p-CrKL and p-STAT5 after 72 hours while p-CrKL was almost fully reactivated with TKIs alone (~29% vs 89% for p-CrKL and 23% vs 50% for p-STAT5). These results point to the possibility of achieving improved therapeutic outcomes in CML patients by simultaneously targeting both BCR-ABL and JAK2 activities in the critical TKI-insensitive CML stem/progenitor reservoir. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207