MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558442297 · doi:10.22230/cjc.2016v41n4a3119

Outsiders Still: Why Women Journalists Love—and Leave—Their Newspaper Careers

2016· article· en· W2558442297 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Patricia H. Audette-Longo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperJournalismAdvertisingPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyGender studiesBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As I took up Vivian Smith's book, Outsiders Still: Why Women Journalists Love-and Leave-Their Newspaper Careers, news broke that the newsroom to which I once belonged, The Edmonton Journal, was hit by a new round of layoffs. The first publicly-reported dismissals were those of the paper's female editor-in-chief and female managing editor. 1 Altogether, thirty-five people were dismissed as operations at the Journal and Edmonton Sun were folded together (CBC News, 2016), and across the Postmedia Network's chain, fifty-five other jobs were cut to scale back costs Days later, the Guelph Mercury-first launched in southern Ontario in 1867 and last owned by Metroland Media Group Ltd., part of the TorStar Corporation-published its last issue and closed its doors, a response to declining advertising revenues (Guelph Mercury, 2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207