Comprehensive review and comparative analysis of compensation networks for Capacitive Power Transfer systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contactless Capacitive Power Transfer (CPT) is one of the emerging fields in the area of wireless power transfer. The system is fairly analogues to the inductive power transfer system. The CPT systems was primarily used for low power and small distance applications due to the development of unsafe voltages across the capacitive interface. However, the use of new compensation networks have enabled the system to be used for small, medium and long distance applications. There is no literature currently available that summarizes all the compensator's available for the CPT network. This makes it extremely difficult to find the best compensator which will suit the requirement of the designer. The paper focuses on the need for compensation and analysis of the system. The results of the analysis can be applied to any of the compensator's that are discussed in the later section. A common ground is then established which would help in finding the best compensator's available. Based on the results obtained, the best compensator for various distances and power applications would be recommended.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it