MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558522997 · doi:10.1115/pvp2016-63277

An Integrated Welding and Damage Model for Practical Prediction of Creep Life in Welded P91 Alloy

2016· article· en· W2558522997 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahyar Asadi, Jun Zhao, Leijun Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLife Prediction Technologies (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWeldingCreepMaterials scienceForensic engineeringMetallurgyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loss of creep resistance in post-weld P91 alloy occurs mainly due to the change in microstructure particularly in the heat-affected zone under actual service operating conditions as well as residual stress from the welding process that is not often properly addressed in many damage models. In this paper, a validated deformation mechanisms map (DMM) using low temperature creep strain accommodation processes i.e. GBS, is used for the P91 alloy that predicts the creep rates over a wide range of temperature and stress including those arising under in the actual service conditions. These creep rates are further utilized into a microstructure-based creep damage model for accurate life prediction. A 3D transient computational welding mechanics (CWM) modeling of a pipe in a super-critical water loop, predicts the thermal, microstructure and stress state from welding. It also determines the coarse and fine grain heat affected zone (CGHAZ & FGHAZ). The CWM results are coupled with physics-based creep damage modeling to practically predict the creep life under the actual service conditions considering the welding residual stress and microstructure states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207