PENGARUH PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP PERUBAHAN-PERUBAHAN KUHP BERKAITAN DENGAN TINDAK PIDANA AERIAL HIJACKING
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International Agreement is very important for growth of national law, especially national criminal law. International Agreement as one of legal source can give information about growth at national law that carried out bilateral conventions and multilateral. The growth of Criminal law in Indonesia is influenced by many growths of international society. This influence is progressively with existence of globalization that affecting at changes of behavior which outwardly shift in law orders. Globalization era have supported by information technology, transportation and communications. One of fast transportation is plane. ICAO as world organization that concern in problem of air transportation said that this transportation is gristle with danger by people with various motifs. Conventions that carried out by ICAO such as Convention of Tokyo year 1963, Convention of Hague year 1970, Convention of Montreal year 1971 that influenced at KUHP after Indonesia have applicator this application can see in Law No. 4 Year 1976 that concerning Hijacking. Kata kunci: Perjanjian Internasional sangat berpengaruh terhadap perubahan hukum pidana khususnya KUHP
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".