MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25586600 · doi:10.2196/ijmr.4022

The Survival of Malidixic Acid Resistance Genetic Marker of Escherichia Coli x1776 through the Gastrointestinal Tract of Mice

2014· article· en· W25586600 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Loren Yamamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Journal of Medical Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscherichia coliGastrointestinal tractBiologyMicrobiologyGeneticsGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Escherichia coli x17?6, a strain created from Escherichia coli K12, is used as an EK2 host (17) in plasmid engineering experiments. It is unable to survive passage through the intestinal tracts of rats at frequencies of less than 10-11 bacteria per milliliter because of several mutations that cause sensitivity to bile and requirements for diamino­ pimelic acid (DAP) and thymine (15). Although DNA degradation accompanies thymine-less death in in vitro experiments and is an all-or-none response for any given cell (15), it is likely that lysis associated with DAP-less death may liberate DNA prior to its degradation. Since undegraded recombinant DNA might be taken up by robust microorganisms encountered in the natural environment, especially in the intestinal tracts of humans after inadvertant ingestion by laboratory workers, by the mechanism of transformation, or as a consequence of con­comitant phage infection, it is important to determine the "survival potential" of such DNA in non-laboratory controlled environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Journal of Medical ResearchSame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207