D’une gentrification inaboutie à une « nouvelle précarisation » ? Continuités populaires et conflits de coprésence dans le centre historique de Palerme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LaMagione, quartier populaire du centre historique de Palerme, fait l’objet depuis plusieurs années d’un important programme de renouvellement urbain visant à promouvoir l’installation de citadins aisés. Cet article se donne pour projet de décrire les effets de la cohabitation conflictuelle entre anciens et nouveaux habitants au sein de ce quartier. Nous montrons que le relatif échec de la gentrification de laMagionedoit être analysé en relation avec les usages que les habitants font des espaces publics du quartier, enjeu tout aussi déterminant que l’accès au logement du point de vue des transformations sociospatiales à l’oeuvre sur ce territoire. Émerge alors l’hypothèse conclusive d’une « nouvelle précarisation » de laMagione, entendue comme processus de déqualification d’un espace urbain partiellement gentrifié, dont nous esquissons ici les conditions de possibilités.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".