MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558716939

Flow and Sediment Prediction at Ungauged Basins Using Artificial Intelligence Models and Entropy Index

2016· dissertation· en· W2558716939 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Entropy (arrow of time)SedimentFlow (mathematics)GeologyHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceMathematicsGeomorphologyPhysicsThermodynamicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prediction of streamflow and sediment load statistics at locations within ungauged remote basins remains one of the most uncertain modelling tasks in hydrology. The intent of this research was to gain a better understanding of flow and sediment load statistics at ungauged basins through 1) developing artificial neural networks (ANN), and gene expression programming (GEP) models that address the complex nonlinear effect of physio-climatic parameters on flow duration curve (FDC) and sediment rating curve (SRC) statistics, 2) determining the most important physio-climatic parameters impacting FDC parameters (mean, variance), and SRC parameters (rating coefficient and exponent), 3) introducing an entropy parameter, apportionment entropy disorder index (AEDI), that represents precipitation variability, 4) adopting techniques within ANN models to cope with data scarcity including the Dropout method and synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), and 5) assessing the impacts of flow regulation on FDC parameters. ANN models trained and tested on 147 stations in Ontario, Canada, revealed that climatic, topographic and land cover characteristics were the most important inputs defining average flow. Topographic and hydrologic characteristics were the most important parameters defining flow variability. ANN and GEP models trained and tested on 260 regulated and unregulated gauging stations across North America showed that drainage area followed by mean annual precipitation, shape factor and AEDI were the most influential parameters on average flow. Regulation was found to affect flow variability and had no significant impact on average flow. Dropout and SMOTE techniques improved model performance. ANN models trained and tested on 94 gauged streams in Ontario, Canada revealed that the rating coefficient is positively correlated to rainfall erosivity factor, soil erodibility factor, and AEDI and negatively correlated to vegetation cover and mean annual snowfall. The rating exponent was found to be positively correlated to mean annual precipitation, AEDI, main channel slope, standard deviation of flow and negatively correlated to the fraction of basin area covered by water. AEDI has been successfully integrated in the FDC and SRC prediction models. Including AEDI parameter in FDC and SRC models improved model performance. This thesis recommends using AEDI in future hydrological modelling research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it