Elucidating the Functional Role of MLIP, a Novel Muscle A-type Lamin Interacting Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A-type lamin mutations are associated with degenerative disorders causing dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy and Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy. Our lab has identified MLIP; a novel protein that interacts with lamin A/C. Knocked down MLIP expression in C2C12 myoblasts down regulates myogenic regulatory factors, MyoD and Myogenin, which delays myogenic differentiation. We hypothesize that MLIP is essential for myogenic differentiation. Our goal is to define the MLIP associated pathways involved in myogenic programming. Gene expression profiling of MLIP stably knocked down C2C12 cells, identified 30 genes implicated in human disease. Mutations in five of those genes (DMPK, HSPB8, LMNB2, NEFL and SGCD) cause muscular dystrophy, neuropathies, and lipodystrophies that have phenotypic overlap with laminopathies. Further studies involving the MLIP knocked down cell lines demonstrated that in the absence of puromycin, MLIP protein expression returns to normal. This in turn affects the interpretation of the gene expression data and attempted MLIP recovery experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".