MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma with Central Nervous System Involvement: An International Multicenter Collaboration

2015· article· en· W2558859525 on OpenAlexaff
Chan Y. Cheah, Paul Broeckelmann, Alison J. Moskowitz, Andreas Engert, Mats Jerkeman, Tarec Christoffer El‐Galaly, Julie M. Vose, Diego Villa, Joseph M. Connors, Tatyana Feldman, Dai Chihara, Chelsea C. Pinnix, Sarah A. Milgrom, Bouthaina S. Dabaja, Yasuhiro Oki, Michelle A. Fanale

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLymphomaIncidence (geometry)DiseaseStage (stratigraphy)Retrospective cohort studyPediatricsOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction In comparison to aggressive NHL, CNS involvement is exceedingly rare in patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Thus, the clinical features and outcomes are not well described. Patients and Methods For this international retrospective analysis, institutional (n =4), national (n =2) and cooperative group (n =1) databases were reviewed for pts with classical HL who developed histologically proven CNS involvement at any stage during their disease course. We included pts diagnosed with CNS involvement after January 1, 1995 and collected clinicopathological characteristics (at both initial diagnosis and at time of CNS involvement), treatment details and outcomes. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method from date of CNS involvement to date of disease progression or death from any cause and death from any cause, respectively. Results We screened 32,047 patients with classical HL in our combined databases and identified 18 pts with histologically confirmed CNS lymphoma, with an estimated crude incidence of 0.05%. These pts had a median age of 40 (range 20 - 84) years at the time of diagnosis of CNS involvement. The characteristics at the time of initial diagnosis of HL are summarized in table 1. CNS involvement was present at the time of initial diagnosis in 10 pts (56%) of whom 3 had isolated CNS involvement and 5 had concurrent systemic involvement (details were unavailable in 2 pts). CNS HL was a feature of relapsed/refractory disease in 8 (44%), 7 of whom had concurrent systemic involvement. The most common presenting symptoms were pyramidal weakness (n=7, 39%), headache (n=5, 28%), sensory change (n=4, 22%) and confusion (n=3, 17%). Lesions were parenchymal (n=10, 62%), leptomeningeal (n=2, 12%) or both (n=4, 25%). The median number of discrete CNS lesions detected by imaging was 1 (range 0 - >10), which affected cortical (n=9, 50%) or subcortical structures (n=6, 33%) and the spinal cord (n=2, 11%). The disease appeared to arise from the dura in 9 cases (50%), and the median size of the largest lesion was 2.5 cm (range 1 - 6). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was performed in 10 (56%) pts; of these, cytology was positive in 4 cases with a median CSF white cell count of 10/uL (range 0 - 136). CSF protein was elevated in 7 cases. Immunohistochemistry for Epstein-Barr virus RNA was done on 6 CNS biopsies, of which 3 were positive. Information regarding therapy was available in 15 pts; 9 received radiotherapy (alone (n=4), with steroids (n=1), with systemic (n=2) or intrathecal chemotherapy (n=2)). A further 3 pts were treated with systemic therapy (alternating cycles of R-IVAC/MTX (n=1), brentuximab vedotin (n=1), MTX, cytarabine and thiotepa (n=1), 2 with steroids alone and 1 with surgical resection alone. Of 13 pts formally evaluated for response, 7 (54%) achieved complete and 1 (8%) partial response, for an overall response rate of 62%. 1 patient underwent consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation. After a median follow up of 3.6 (range 0.8 - 13.2) years from diagnosis of CNS involvement, 9 pts experienced disease progression: 1 in the CNS alone, 3 at systemic sites alone, and 5 with both systemic and CNS sites with a median PFS of 9.5 months (Fig 1A). At last follow up, 11 pts have died (6 of progressive disease, 3 from sepsis and 2 from unknown causes) with a median OS of 37 months (Fig 1B). CNS involvement at initial diagnosis vs at relapse (Fig 1C,D) was associated with favorable PFS and OS, whilst isolated CNS involvement was associated with superior PFS but not OS (Fig 1E,F). Conclusion CNS involvement in HL is exceedingly rare and has a distinct clinical presentation with predilection for parenchymal lesions with dural extension (as opposed to true hematogenous spread), providing an important differential diagnosis for meningioma in this setting. CNS HL presenting as an initial manifestation of disease appears to be associated with favorable outcomes. Table 1. Characteristics of patients at initial diagnosis of HL Characteristics at initial diagnosis of HL data avail. n (%) Male 18 11 (61) Histologic subtype 17 Nodular-sclerosing 13 (77) Lymphocyte-rich 3 (18) Lymphocyte-depleted 1 (6) Stage 18 1 2 (11) 2 5 (28) 3 3 (17) 4 8 (44) B sx 18 10 (56) Pruritus 15 3 (20) Nodal size >10 cm 14 3 (21) Hb <10.5 g/dL 13 3 (23) WCC >15 x 109/L 13 2 (15) lymphocytes <0.6 x 109/L 12 2 (17) International Prognostic Score 6 0-1 1 (17) 2-3 3 (50) ≥4 2 (33) Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Vose: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Villa:Roche: Research Funding. Connors:Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207