MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558903599 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2016.7746273

Smart sensor network for smart buildings

2016· article· en· W2558903599 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Lobachev, Edmond Cretu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceEmbedded systemIndustrial EthernetEthernetWireless sensor networkScalabilityEnergy consumptionComputer networkEngineeringOperating systemElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the new age of technology, internet and ever-improving communications many trends and fields have been appearing, such as smart phones and their applications, internet of things, renewable energy sources and smart buildings. The latter utilizes a number of aspects from the former, as the size of the buildings keeps growing, the engineers and designers aim to reduce energy consumption and ecological footprint, make the building safer and more sustainable. This has stimulated the growth of the field of sensor networks. This paper discusses a smart sensor network which utilizes Power over Ethernet, P.o.E., supplied by a Cisco Catalyst 4507R+E switch and cloud computing to provide an easily scalable and adaptable system that would be able to adapt easily to a wide array of applications and fit the demands of new trends. The system was tested on Raspberry Pi and BeagleBone microcontroller boards as sensor hubs, and uses DigitalOcean as the cloud computing service of choice. The server in this implementation acts as a user interface, front end, and as the console unit, back end. The system has demonstrated to have fast communication times of below 200ms in a cross-continental setting and able to provide fast processing times of under 1s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207