MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Initial and Long-Term Outcomes of Splenectomy in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

2007· review· en· W2558955680 on OpenAlexaff
Joseph Mıkhael, Craig M. Kessler, Mark D. Danese, Robert Deuson

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSplenectomyMedicineMeta-analysisThrombocytopenic purpuraObservational studySurgeryInternal medicinePlateletSpleen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Splenectomy serves as a common therapy in treating adults with chronic ITP. Laparoscopic splenectomy was introduced in 1991 with the goal of reducing complication rates. This study was designed to estimate both the initial surgical non-response rate and the long-term relapse rate of splenectomy in the post-laparoscopic era. A systematic literature review was conducted by searching PubMed for articles published between January 1, 1991 and October 3, 2006. Selection criteria included: chronic ITP, study enrollment in 1990 or later, ≥12 months of follow-up, ≥15 patients with ITP, ≥75% of patients at least 14 years of age, not HIV positive, and not undergoing a second splenectomy. Response rates for surgery were collected according to an author-defined platelet response criterion (platelet counts <50x109/L or <30x109/L in 75% of studies). Relapse rates post-splenectomy (using the same platelet response criteria) were also collected. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate a pooled surgical non-response rate as well as a pooled relapse rate in responders by weighting the study-specific estimates by the inverse of their variances, using Stata 9™. The pooled relapse rate was converted to a probability using the exponential formula, e(-rate x time). We identified 161 articles for detailed review. Of these, 24 met our inclusion criteria, all of which were observational studies. These studies represent 1,138 laparoscopic splenectomies (66 or 5.8% were converted to open splenectomy during surgery), and 317 open or undefined splenectomies. The average surgical non-response rate across 21 studies reporting data was 12.2% (95% CI: 10.3–14.3%). The average long-term relapse rate per person year across all studies was 53 per 1,000 patient years (95% CI: 45.0–62.0%). This corresponds to a 5% per year failure rate, or 32% failure rate after 5 years, for all patients initiating surgery. Initial non-response rate to planned splenectomy is 12% in adults with ITP. For patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy, 6% required conversion to open splenectomy. The 5 year relapse rate post-splenectomy is 32%. Splenectomy, although the current standard of care, is not always initially successful and does not provide a durable response in all patients. The benefits and risks of splenectomy must be weighed in light of newer options of therapy currently available. Relapse Rate per 1,000 Patient-years of Follow-up for Each Study Relapse Rate per 1,000 Patient-years of Follow-up for Each Study

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.036
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207