Recherche-action dans l’université du 3e millénaire. 2001 : l’odyssée de la classe ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La recherche en classe de langue, véritable laboratoire de recherche vivant, est nécessairement une recherche-action : comment améliorer mon enseignement et leur apprentissage ? Elle amène souvent au développement de nouveaux outils ou de nouvelles méthodes.Mais, parfois, les choses se gâtent. Ainsi, les étudiants s’opposent parfois à ce qu’ils considèrent comme « servir de cobayes ». D’autre part, aux yeux des chercheurs traditionnels, la recherche-action n’est qu’un parent pauvre de la recherche. De plus, l’administration se méfie souvent de cette recherche hybride et multiplie les comités d’éthique.Ma communication constituera donc une forme de recherche-action : j’y retracerai mon odyssée personnelle en enseignement multimédia du français langue seconde, et partagerai mes questionnements, mes plans d’action et mes résultats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".