Regulating Internet Banking In Nigeria : Some Success Prescriptions- Part 2
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is the second part of an earlier one on the problems and challenges of Internet banking regulation in Nigeria . The paper argues that for Internet banking to assume a developmental dimension in Nigeria and for the country to be fully integrated in the global financial environment, the prevalent level of frauds in Nigeria (and among Nigerians) must first be addressed. It suggests that the ways to do this are first to: get the relevant local laws in place and in consonance with international laws and conventions; get the citizens well educated on the intricacies of Internet usage and frauds, as well as the regulatory implications of wrong/fraudulent uses of the Internet; ensure that all the major background problems such as poverty, corruption and bad governance are addressed and; ensure adequate interface and collaborations between Nigerian local law enforcement agents and the various international agencies that are presenting pursuing the course for safe Internet community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it