Emergency Core Cooling System Sump Strainer Fibre Bypass Testing and Measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential of losing post-Loss Of Coolant Accident (LOCA) recirculation capability due to debris blockage of Emergency Core Cooling (ECC) strainers resulted in early replacements of ECC strainers in most nuclear power plants. To validate the performance of ECC strainers, extensive testing representing plant conditions is required. Such testing programs include thin-bed and full debris load pressure drop tests, fibre bypass tests and chemical effects tests. Multiple testing loops and state-of-the-art analysis techniques have provided in-depth understanding of sump strainer performance and the effect of chemical precipitation on debris bed head loss. ECC strainers typically use perforated plates as filtering surfaces with 1.6 to 2.5 mm holes and 35 to 40% open area, allowing some particulates and fibres to pass through the strainer filtering surfaces. Recently, the bypassed fibrous debris has been identified as a potential safety concern due to its possible deposition in the reactor core and blocking of flow into fuel assemblies. In some cases, the amount of fibre that is specified as allowed to enter a reactor core is only 15 g per fuel assembly for pressurized water reactors. Characterization and quantification of bypassed fibre debris for nuclear power plants are needed to address regulatory requirements. Testing methodology and analysis techniques to address regulatory requirements and concerns are presented in this paper. In particular, a newly developed technique is presented to address debris bypass quantification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".