MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559135900 · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201601457

Highly Regioselective Monoacylation of Unprotected Glucopyranoside Using Transient Directing‐Protecting Groups

2016· article· en· W2559135900 on OpenAlexafffund
Sylvain Rocheleau, Joshua Pottel, Igor Huskić, Nicolas Moitessier

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCarbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRegioselectivityChemistryMonosaccharideIntramolecular forceSurface modificationCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryProtecting groupCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The regioselective functionalization of monosaccharides is notoriously achieved using metal catalysis, lengthy synthetic strategies requiring protection/deprotection, various enzymes, or other methods that target cis ‐diols (and thus cannot be used with glucopyranose derivatives), In this paper, we report a new method using selected boronic acids as temporary protecting groups, and describe its application to the regioselective functionalization of methyl α‐ d ‐glucopyranoside, the most difficult monosaccharide to functionalize regioselectively. Generally, reactions of glucopyranosides may lead to a plethora of mono‐ and polyfunctionalized derivatives, yet our method gave the 3‐ O ‐acetylated, 2‐ O ‐benzoylated, and 2‐ O ‐pivaloylated derivatives of methyl α‐ d ‐glucopyranoside as major products. We focused on the use of recyclable and green temporary protecting groups (in a one‐pot reaction) and on the modulation of the intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding network using selected arylboronic acids. A complete scalable procedure leading to a single regioisomer from unprotected methyl α‐ d ‐glucopyranoside is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207