MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559151831 · doi:10.3138/cjh.49.2.279

<i>Stagestruck: The Business of Theater in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Colonies</i>, by Lauren R. Clay

2014· article· en· W2559151831 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Clare Haru Crowston

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of History · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsState (computer science)HistoriographyCapital (architecture)Business historySociologyArt historyLawHistoryEconomic historyPolitical scienceAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stagestruck: The Business of Theater in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Colonies, by Lauren R. Clay. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2013. xvi, 334 pp. $49.95 US (cloth). Lauren Clay's study of the business of theatre in eighteenth-century France is a model of ambitious, thoughtful research. This is the rare work of French history that is truly national in scale and the author offers well-reasoned contributions to multiple fields of history. Analysis of the theatre has been far from rare in recent French historiography. Where previous works, by scholars such as Gregory Brown, Susan Maslan, and Paul Friedland, have tended to focus on theatricality and its relationship to literary or political culture, Clay's work stands out for its focus on the material and commercial elements of this industry as well as for its refusal to be mesmerized by the royal companies in Paris. Clay argues, indeed, that the most important developments in the rise of public theatre in this period occurred in the provinces and the colonies--in Lille, Le Mans or LeCap---rather than in the capital. To uncover the daily activities of theatre directors, actors and actresses, spectators and state and municipal authorities, Clay has conducted research in a staggering list of cities including, in addition to LeMans and Lille: Saumur, Rouen, Nantes, Besancon, Bordeaux, Marseille, Lyon, Strasbourg, and Paris. Her sources include administrative records, correspondence among state, provincial, and municipal authorities, petitions from actors and directors to the Comedie frangaise, and an apparently unique list of subscription holders for the 1787-1788 season of the Lyon theatre. She has also read extensively in the published sources of the period, which have yielded newspapers, travelers' memoirs, Enlightenment treatises, and at least one actor's autobiography. In seven thematically organized chapters, Clay traces the establishment and operation of theatres from the late seventeenth century to the 1780s. Chapter One opens the story with an examination of the entrepreneurs and investors who replaced the old makeshift auditoriums (often borrowed from tennis courts) with new purpose-built structures, a story continued in Chapter Two's account of the architectural evolution of playhouses toward ever more elaborate and elegant structures. Chapter Three delineates the (limited) role played by royal officials in the rise and oversight of provincial theatre. Chapters Four through Six recount in turn the emergence of professional theatre directors in place of the traditional collaborative management practices, the labour of actors and actresses in the newly enlarged, permanent provincial troupes, and the spectators whose numbers swelled throughout the 1760s to 1780s to fill the new playhouses. The final chapter analyzes the arrival of public theatre in the cities of Saint-Domingue, where the number of seats per capita eventually outstripped their metropolitan counterparts. Clay situates her work in a number of distinct, yet related, historiographical contexts. The first is absolutist rule and its relation to cultural production. Here, Clay argues that--in contrast to what one might expect from the abundant historiography on the theatricality of absolute power and the centralization of culture undertaken by Louis XIV--the royal government played little direct role in the rise of the theatre industry outside of Paris. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HistorySame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207