MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559206635

Editorial Focus: Graphite and Graphene

2013· editorial· en· W2559206635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gary Economo

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraphiteGrapheneTonneFocus (optics)Investment (military)Materials scienceNanotechnologyBusinessEngineeringMetallurgyPolitical sciencePoliticsWaste managementPhysicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) said in its 2013 flake graphite report, that some 800m tonnes of natural crystalline graphite is exploitable worldwide. For example, battery manufacturers' costs in 2012 for graphite anode material was approximately $5,000/tonne. *[Gary Economo] is president and CEO of Focus Graphite Inc., owner of the Lac Knife, Quebec high-grade graphite deposit and, president and CEO of Grafoid Inc., the graphene investment and application development company.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0140.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207