MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559213135 · doi:10.2113/gscpgbull.64.3.438

Evolution of Li-enriched oilfield brines in Devonian carbonates of the south-central Alberta Basin, Canada

2016· article· en· W2559213135 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
G.F. Huff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCitationStructural basinDevonianGeological surveyLibrary scienceMining engineeringGeochemistryPaleontologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| September 01, 2016 Evolution of Li-enriched oilfield brines in Devonian carbonates of the south-central Alberta Basin, Canada G.F. Huff G.F. Huff Alberta Geological Survey, 4999 – 98 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information G.F. Huff Alberta Geological Survey, 4999 – 98 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6B 2X3 Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 02 Jun 2015 Accepted: 22 May 2016 First Online: 13 Jul 2017 Online Issn: 2368-0261 Print Issn: 0007-4802 © the Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2016) 64 (3): 438–448. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.64.3.438 Article history Received: 02 Jun 2015 Accepted: 22 May 2016 First Online: 13 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation G.F. Huff; Evolution of Li-enriched oilfield brines in Devonian carbonates of the south-central Alberta Basin, Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2016;; 64 (3): 438–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.64.3.438 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract There is a long and extensive history of study regarding the origins and characteristics of brines within the Alberta Basin of Canada. This study focuses on the origins of Li-enriched (>50 mg/kg) brines of the late Devonian Swan Hills, Nisku and Leduc Formations of the southwestern Alberta Basin. Available data show that two Li-enriched brines having distinctly different geochemical characteristics, and thus distinct evolutionary histories, exist within the late Devonian carbonates of the southwestern Alberta Basin.Li-enriched brine of the Swan Hills Formation appears to have been formed by dissolution of halite and mixing with Li-enriched fluids expelled from Precambrian crystalline basement. The degree of mixing between Swan Hills brines and meteoric water is unknown.Formation of Li-enriched brines in the Nisku and Leduc Formations could be explained by preferential dissolution of Li-enriched late-stage evaporite minerals, likely from the middle Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation, into evapoconcentrated late Devonian seawater. Dense Li-enriched brine migrated downward into the underlying early Devonian Winnipegosis Formation and then westward in response to westward tilting beginning in Jurassic time. Li-enriched brine was then diluted by mixing with meteoric water driven into the Devonian of the southwestern Alberta Basin in response to hydraulic gradients created by the effects of Laramide tectonics. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.151
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207