MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559316157 · doi:10.1107/s2053273314083910

Crystallographic Aspects of the CDW Instabilities in NbSe3

2014· article· en· W2559316157 on OpenAlexaff
A. Prodan, Herman Van Midden, Erik Zupanič, Rok Žitko, Joachim Kusz, Maciej Zubko, J.C. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceScanning tunneling microscopeCharge density waveLattice (music)Condensed matter physicsQuantum tunnellingCrystallographyInstabilityChemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsQuantum mechanicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charge-density waves (CDW) in some quasi one-dimensional compounds can be depinned from the lattice by an external electric field. In the case of NbSe3, two CDW transitions have been reported with onset temperatures of 144 K and 59 K. From an analysis of the published low-temperature (LT) scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images, which inherently allow the resolution of domain structures on the atomic scale, an alternative model of the CDW modulated structures in NbSe3 is proposed. In contrast to the existing model, where two incommensurate (IC) modes, q1 = (0,0.241,0) and q2 = (0.5,0.260,0.5) are selectively confined to two of three available structurally distinguished types of bi-capped trigonal prismatic columns, the alternative model [1,2] proceeds from the assumption that both columns of the same pair are alternatively modulated by the two modes, whose IC components add within experimental error into a commensurate value. The observed domains are formed as a result of the different bonding within and between the structural layers, separated by Van der Waals gaps, and of the ability of the two modes to be easily interchanged between two symmetry-related columns of the same type. This assumption is in accord with the published LT STM results, which confirm i.a. the presence of both IC modes above 59 K, where according to the previous model only the q1 contribution should be expected. A pair of two alternatively modulated columns of the same type represents the basic structural unit of the CDW ground state. The two modes can formally be replaced by a single inharmonic modulation, obtained by "beating" between the two IC modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations and AdvancesSame topicSolid-state spectroscopy and crystallographyFrench-language works237,207