Abstract 17689: Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation Reduces Inflammation and Improves Physical Function in Patient With Coronary Artery Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Poor physical function impairs fitness and is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. Arthritis and joint dysfunction limit physical function in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Hypothesis: Omega-3 fatty acids (FA) improve physical function in CAD patients through reducing inflammation. Methods: We randomized 249 subjects with stable CAD to 3.6 of omega-3 FA (1.86 g of eicosapentaenoic acid + 1.5 g of docosahexaenoic acid) per day or no omega-3 (control) for one year. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to evaluate pain, stiffness and physical function at baseline and one year follow-up. Inflammation was assessed by total white blood cell (WBC) count and its subsets as well as urine microalbumin-creatinine ratio (MCR). Results: Mean age was 63.0 ± 7.58 years; 17% were women. Controls had worsening stiffness (% Δ = 8.4%; p = 0.036) at 1 year follow-up while those on omega-3 FA had no change (% Δ = 0.4%, p = 0.886 - see Table)(a lower percent change indicates better functioning). Compared to controls, those on omega-3 FA had better physical function (% Δ = 8.5% vs. -2.8%, p = 0.011), and total WOMAC scores (% Δ = 7.8% vs. -2.5%, p = 0.011) and a significant decrease in WBC (% Δ = -3.5 vs. -9.4%; p=0.009) and neutrophils (% Δ = -3.5% vs. -11.6%; p=0.005) at one year follow-up. MCR significantly worsened only in the control group (% Δ = 53.3%, p = 0.037) at one year follow-up (p-value for control vs. omega-3 FAs groups = 0.026). Monocytes were decreased in the omega-3 FAs group at one year compared to baseline (% Δ = -11.1%, p < 0.001) and directly correlated with physical function and total scores (p = 0.033 and p = 0.024, respectively). Conclusions: Omega-3 FAs attenuate worsening of physical function over a one year period in CAD patients possibly mediated through an anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, omega-3 FA may benefit CAD patients by improving their physical function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".