Conformation-independent structural comparison of macromolecules with ProSMART
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Structural comparison often aids insight into the function and mechanics of biological macromolecules. To make such analyses more accessible, we present the Procrustes Structural Matching Alignment and Restraints Tool (ProSMART), which is designed to allow fast but detailed comparative analysis of macromolecular structures despite potential dissimilarities in global arrangement, such as domain motion and distortion. Whilst obtaining a residue alignment between structures is a prerequisite for comparative analysis, conventional alignment methods may fail in cases where conformational differences are dramatic. However, ProSMART achieves a conformation-independent structural alignment by focusing purely on local dissimilarities, rather than enforcing chain/domain rigidity. This allows the sensible comparison of protein (or DNA/RNA) structures in the presence of conformational change. ProSMART allows analysis of the structural conservation of local backbone and side chains in a wide variety of scenarios - the method is sensitive enough to allow identification of subtle dissimilarities between structures sharing high sequence homology, whilst being versatile enough to allow identification of local similarities between more distantly-related structures. In addition, ProSMART can be used for the identification of conserved rigid substructures, which may or may not represent functional domains. ProSMART is also used for the generation of external restraints for use in crystallographic refinement. Results from ProSMART can be visualised in either CCP4mg or PyMOL. All residue-based scores are illustrated using intuitive colour gradients, allowing easy visual assessment of local backbone and side chain conservation. Complementary structural comparison tools such as ProSMART can help break the complexity of the constantly growing pool of available structural data into a more readily accessible form, and consequently may aid biological insight into macromolecular structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it