Synthesis & Xray structures of Rare Pentacoordinate Pincer Complexes of Ni(II)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pincer complexes have been a major focus in organometallic chemistry over the past four decades due to their important potential in catalysis and materials science. In the case of pincer complexes of d8 metals, a growing number of charge-neutral and cationic derivatives featuring hydrides, alkyls, and other reactive moieties have been shown to catalyze important transformations. Regarding the mechanisms of these catalytic reactions, an important issue that remains unresolved concerns the type of intermediates formed upon substrate uptake, namely: A: Do substrates displace one or more hemi-labile donor moieties of the pincer ligand? Or B: Does the substrate occupy a fifth coordination site while the pincer ligand remains intact (Scheme 1)? In this presentation, Xray crystallography is used to describe the influence of the substitue on the 18-electron species based on POCN-Ni precursors. These new diamagnetic complexes are proposed as models for the intermediates that might be involved in catalytic reactions promoted by this family of complexes (Scheme 2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".