MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Negative Impact of Pre-Transplant Anemia on Long-Term Outcome after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

2004· article· en· W2559414602 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Lazongas, Cindy J. Wong, David Sutton, Jeffrey H. Lipton, Anargyros Xenocostas, Hans A. Messner

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematological disorders and diagnostics
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityRobarts Clinical TrialsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineTransplantationGastroenterologyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationAnemiaHemoglobinSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Anemia is commonly present in patients with malignancies and is associated with reduced survival times. Recently, we described that low (<110 g/L) pre-transplant hemoglobin levels (PT-Hb) are associated with decreased early survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT)(Xenocostas et al. Transfusion2003;43:373–382). We are now presenting data on long-term survival and causes of death in BMT recipients with and without anemia prior to alloHSCT. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 511 patients consecutively transplanted between January 1995 and March 2000 was performed to evaluate survival, cause of death, and PT-Hb. The end date for follow-up was June 2002. The median follow-up time was 993 days. Causes of death were categorized either as relapse, treatment-related mortality (TRM), or other. PT-Hb levels were determined within 2 weeks prior to transplantation, after commencing conditioning chemotherapy. Comparisons between groups were done using chi-squared tests. Results: The 180-day survival of patients with low PT-Hb levels (<110 g/L) was significantly worse than that of patients with PT-Hb levels ≥110 g/L (57.1% versus 83.1%, p<0.0001). The survival difference remained significant at 5 years (36.2% versus 59.4%, p<0.0001). The difference in 180-day survival was contributed to by an increase in TRM (36.1% versus 14.9%, p<0.0001) as well as a higher relapse rate (4.4% versus 0.3%, p=0.019 by Fisher’s exact test). For patients surviving more than 180 days, there was no difference in TRM (16.7% versus 16.7%, p=0.987) or relapse rate (12.0% versus 7.3%, p=0.150). No difference in the rate of other causes of death was found between the groups at either the 180-day or 5-year time points. Conclusions: Pre-transplant anemia is an independent risk factor for increased mortality following alloHSCT. Relapse and treatment-related deaths are both more likely to occur early in the post-transplant course of patients experiencing pre-transplant anemia. Differences in long-term survival are predominantly related to treatment-related deaths rather than relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHematological disorders and diagnosticsFrench-language works237,207