Alicante Beach- City Sustainable Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our research is focused on the city of Alicante (Spain).In concrete, the sunken area studied is placed at the south of Alicante Port, being the point of entry from the airport to the city.There are two important reasons that have generated that depressed area.Firstly, the development of the city has led to a change in the use of the soil, and secondly, the extension of Alicante Port.This area used to be a metallurgical industrial zone, but during the last 40 years, it has overcome an urban growth.The European Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM), the most modern Film Studio in Europe 'Ciudad de la luz', a desalination plant and residential complexes and offices have settled down there.Unfortunately, all this development has occurred without taking into account the coastal needs.Regarding to that, several elements that contribute to the deterioration of the area can be found along the coast, that is the mouth of a rift called 'Barranco de las Ovejas' at north, the 'Agua Amarga' rift at south and the desalination sewage pipe.Besides, there is a merchandise train line adjoining the Maritime-Terrestrial Public Domain that provides service to the port, but hinders the way for pedestrians going to the beach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".