Bibliographic record
Abstract
La relation entre espace et bande dessinée peut être abordée sous deux angles complémentaires, à savoir: (1) comment la bande dessinée représente l’espace et (2) la nature spatiale de la planche et de la double planche. Cette articulation des deux niveaux rend bien compte de la complexité du rapport entre la bande dessinée et l’espace, puisque celui-ci a en fait une double nature, réelle et symbolique, là où l’espace représenté est dessiné sur un espace que l’on pourrait qualifier de “représentant”. Nous allons développer cette réflexion en analysant quelques albums récents réalisés par des auteurs vivant et travaillant à Montréal et que nous avons classés – en nous appuyant notamment sur des textes théoriques issus de la géographie sociale et de la linguistique urbaine – en trois catégories: les albums centrés sur le territoire, les albums centrés sur les lieux, les albums centrés sur les non lieux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".