MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulated and Measured Magnetic Performance of a Double APPLE-II Undulator at the Canadian Light Source

2016· article· en· W2559484762 on OpenAlex
Cameron Baribeau, Les Dallin, Jessie Helfrich, Tor Pedersen, Michael Sigrist, Ward Wurtz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJACOW · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsChicken Farmers of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUndulatorOpticsPhysicsRadiation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assembly and shimming are underway for a double APPLE-II type elliptically polarized undulator (i.e. two magnet arrays installed side by side on a single support structure) at the Canadian Light Source. The device is planned to be installed in spring 2017. Extensive preparation was done prior to device assembly, particularly in development of a simulated annealing algorithm for magnet virtual shimming, as well as assembly procedures that minimized positional errors in the installed magnet blocks. In this paper we present measurements taken throughout the shimming process, and compare with predictions from a RADIA model where each magnet block was magnetized uniquely according to individual Helmholtz coil measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it