MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559535152

Materials Compatibility Issues With Biomass-Derived Oils

2015· article· en· W2559535152 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James R. Keiser, Michael P. Brady, Michael D. Kass, Samuel A. Lewis, Raynella M. Connatser, Donovan N. Leonard

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Materials Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of Energy EfficiencyUT-BattelleBattelleNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsCompatibility (geochemistry)Environmental scienceBiochemical engineeringPulp and paper industryWaste managementEngineeringChemical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Production of liquid fuels and higher value chemicals from biomass provides a means to lessen our dependence on fossil fuels and, consequently, contributes to a reduction in production of greenhouse gases.However, thermochemically derived products from biomass contain large quantities of oxygen-containing compounds, and there are undesirable characteristics associated with these biomass-derived oils.The carboxylic acids, particularly formic acid, are corrosive to many common structural alloys, and other compounds, particularly ketones, cause degradation of many of the common elastomeric materials used for seals in liquid systems.New analysis techniques, including separations and structurally descriptive mass spectrometry, have been developed to characterize these bio-oils, laboratory corrosion studies have been conducted to assess the effects of the bio-oils on both metallic and nonmetallic materials, and examinations have been conducted on metallic samples and components exposed in operating liquefaction facilities.Results indicate preferential internal oxidation occurs in some 300 series stainless steels and degradation of many elastomeric materials is found after exposure in a mixture containing partially hydrotreated bio-oil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicEngineering and Materials Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207